1
20
6
-
Document
A resource containing textual data. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Brent Jesiek
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Virginia Tech News
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2008-03-14
Description
An account of the resource
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:00:00 -0400
From: Virginia.Tech.news@vt.edu
To: Multiple recipients <LISTSERV@LISTSERV.VT.EDU>
Subject: President Steger to discuss status of April 16 recommendations
Friday, March 14, 2008
Virginia Tech President Charles W. Steger and members of the university administration will brief the university community on the current status of the myriad recommendations made in internal and external reports in the aftermath of the April 16 shootings on our campus.
This "town hall" event will be held March 19, 5:30 to 7 p.m. in Squires Student Center Haymarket Theatre.
At Steger's request, Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine appointed an independent review panel with a comprehensive mandate. The governor's executive order instructed the panel to conduct a thorough and independent review, "including a review of educational laws, policies and institutions, the public safety and health care procedures and responses, and the mental health delivery system. With respect to these areas of review, the panel should focus on what went right, what went wrong, what practices should he considered best practices, and what practices are in need of improvement."
On May 9, 2007 Steger directed three internal reviews in the wake of the April 16 tragedy on the Virginia Tech campus. He directed the chairs "to look at strengths and weaknesses of our existing systems/infrastructure and how they may be improved or augmented to address emergency situations that might arise in the future."
The Virginia Tech committees were charged with the following:
The Security Infrastructure Group was charged with examining the university's existing security systems and recommending changes that would enhance the university's ability to respond quickly and effectively in situations where the safety of the campus community is jeopardized. This group was also directed to identify strategies that might decrease the probability of such situations occurring, looking at both technological and behavioral aspects.
The Information and Communications Infrastructure Group analyzed and inventoried the communication infrastructure and information systems used during the crisis period, evaluated their performance, and identifies tactics and strategies for improvements.
The Interface Group evaluated the relationships between the university's student counseling services, academic affairs, judicial affairs, and the legal system. It was charged with examining the existing systems and the interface between them and determining what constraints, legal or otherwise, hamper effective interactions in order to respond to and support at-risk students.
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Title
A name given to the resource
President Steger to discuss status of April 16 recommendations
recommendations
reports
review panel
steger
town hall
-
Document
A resource containing textual data. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Brent Jesiek
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Jason Wittman
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2007-09-25
Description
An account of the resource
By CoachJason - Posted on September 24th, 2007
~Comments on the shootings at Santana High School in Santee, CA and Columbine High School and a call for zero tolerance for Teasing, Taunting, Ridicule and Bullying (TTRB) and the teaching of self-esteem.~
I originally wrote this article, just after the Santana High School shooting in Santee, CA in March 2001. I thought then and still do that the press concentrating on "guns in schools" and "bullying" stories are talking about symptoms (guns) and only part of the problem (bullying). We are now at the eight year anniversary of the shootings at Columbine High School and now there is yet another and far worse shooting spree at the Virginia Tech University. From the press reports and the statements of school officials and concerned citizens, it doesn't seem like much has changed to change the chances of future catastrophes. It is the same old speculative explanations and remedies that have not worked to date. Once again, I offer my suggestions that are based on a lifetime of successfully working with marginalized kids. Please take note.
When 15-year-old Andy Williams opened fire on the students of Santana High School in Santee, CA, on Monday, March 6th, he fulfilled the hidden desires and became an instant hero to millions of school kids across the country, as did Eric and Dylan, the Columbine High shooters, before him. If this statement horrifies you, please read on.
By all the newspaper and TV accounts, Andy was a marginal, ridiculed, picked on, quite passive, "disaffected and unhappy boy, frequently taunted by his peers." He was called "country boy" and the king of all taunts, "gay." His classmates described him as "a twerp, skinny, and very quiet." He laughed off verbal and even physical abuse and never fought back. He was beginning to drink and use drugs to fit in with the crowd. This is much the same profile as the other kids who shot up their schools. It is also the profile of millions of other school kids. Sure, most of them would never do what he did. Fear of the consequences and moral, religious and ethical convictions would have mitigated such a solution. They would just continue to suffer in silence. But to most of them, even to their own horror, the thought, accompanied by a slight smile, of "Pay-back Time!" might have crossed their minds.
In the Columbine High shootings, the press reported at the time that student said the shooters, Eric and Dylan, were continually harassed because of the perception that they were gay. They were regularly called "faggots." I was able to confirm that they were, in fact, under continual pressure for being gay in a conversation with a gay youth in Denver who knew them.
Today, as for the last 35+ years, I work with teens and young adults, many of whom fit this profile. Probably why I relate so well with them is that at their age I, too, fit that profile. I was a scrawny, twerp, teased about big ears, large feet and being too smart. I would have probably been labeled "gay" if the word had been in use then. I laughed off their taunts and never fought back, per my Mother's instructions. Fortunately, I found the protective shelter of the high school drama club and its caring teacher/advisor and by spending lots of time with adults.
The part of my high school experience and how I coped with it, that is most germane to this discussion is that, on many a night, I can remember going to sleep while fantasizing the torture and destruction of my tormentors. Fortunate for me and them, the social controls on kid growing up in the late 1950's, the total lack of support and role models for such action, no guns in our household and my own lack of confidence to even pull off a decent suicide made turning that fantasy into a reality an impossibility. Today, though, kids with these feelings and fantasies have the means, the role models, the support from some of the darker parts of pop culture, and the either active or tacit support of their peers. This is why an immediate preventative action plan is needed.
After these random school shootings, the question is always why did the shooters kill innocent bystanders, people that were not their tormentors? The reason is that after years of being the recipients of teasing, taunting, ridicule and bullying (TTRB) the "Johnny, Billy ....and Coach Williams won't ever leave me alone" turns into "<b>They</b> won't ever leave me alone!" At that point, everyone becomes the target of retribution.
Addressing bullying is not enough. Bullying's three cousins in harassment; Teasing, Taunting, and Ridicule, are different enough and just as much of a problem to the victims to be worthy of addressing on their own right. Ridicule, incidentally, is what teachers do. When I was in high school, it was usually the gym teachers. When teachers ridicule students it presents a negative role model and gives tacit permission for students to engage in TTRB themselves.
Since the shootings in Santee, the usual suggestions for preventing another such tragedy have been offered in the media. As usual, they miss the mark now as they have in the past. The Santee school system had in place all of the most up to date solutions, they had an anti-violence program, adult monitors, all sorts of contingency plans, the works. Obviously, it wasn't enough. So what will work? I have two suggestions based on over 35 years of working with teenagers. The first one is easy to implement. The second is a long-term solution that will not only deal with this issue but will most probably greatly reduce teen use of alcohol and drugs.
Suggestion #1 is to institute in every school, starting with pre-school, a policy of zero tolerance for teasing, taunting, ridicule and bullying (TTRB). In the workplace, today, a slightly off-color or sexual remark can legally be the subject of a sexual harassment lawsuit. However, on school campuses teasing is dealt with, if it is dealt with at all, by attempts at fortifying the coping skills of the victim. I have no quarrel with those efforts and my second suggestion is probably the most effective way to do that, but they are secondary to stopping the aggression, period! "Boys will be boys" will no longer do. Kids can get kicked out of school under the zero gun policy just for pointing their finger like it is a gun at another student. Schools need to be at least as strict in dealing with those who verbally assault their fellow students. Principals, school officials, teachers, other responsible adults and fellow students that tolerate any degree of teasing, taunting and harassment or who join in or initiate the ridicule of a student must be held accountable. Zero tolerance for teasing, ridicule, taunting and bullying AND the failure to report or stop such activities, must become the enforced norm in all schools.
The Newport-Mesa Unified School District in Orange County, Calif. has become the first school system to modify its zero-tolerance policy to include, "any gestures, comments, threats or actions...which cause or threaten to cause...bodily harm or personal degradation." Strict adoption of this kind of policy, nationwide, will go a long way to eliminating most campus violence including playground fistfights.
Suggestion #2 is to teach self-esteem and self-love to all students starting in pre-school. My experience working with teenagers over the years has lead me to believe that lack of self-esteem and love is the root cause of most, if not all, of student problems including, under-achieving, substance abuse and addictions, acting out behaviors and especially campus violence. The bully, taunter and teaser does so in an effort to compensate for and to fix an emptiness inside by putting someone else down. People who love themselves have no need to oppress others. Kids, who do love themselves, have more resilience to the negativity of their peers. They also are less likely to get caught up in abusive relationships and will be more likely to seek out as partners, those who also have an excess of self-love to share.
How to teach self-esteem and love is the subject of many books, including a future one from me. There is, though, a very effective, ultra-simple and best of all, no-cost solution for teaching self-esteem and self-love. Everyone that I have ever taught this to, from pre-schoolers to adults, has experienced huge improvements. This is one thing that assisted me the most build my self-esteem and love. Here is the description of how to teach it, followed by why I believe it is so effective:
"From now on, every time you see your reflection in a mirror, you MUST smile AND say one nice thing about yourself. This nice thing is something you already know that is good about you. It can be a physical thing, but even better if it is an internal goodness, like being considerate or sharp witted. It is not an affirmation, which is something you would like to believe about yourself and say repetitiously until, hopefully, it sinks in. The other part of this exercise is that if you use the mirror to beat yourself up, you must say two nice things for every nasty one!
This exercise works because it develops a new habit of saying nice things to oneself, which automatically leads of self-love. Most people with low self-love and esteem have a well-developed habit of beating themselves up verbally (and sometimes physically). Perfectionists are the masters of this, since they will always perform below their expectations. When this new habit of smiling and saying nice things to oneself replaces the old self-deprecating one, a new person emerges. A side benefit is that one can't smile and feel down at the same time, so these periodic, face-induced smiles can help break a downward emotional slide.
An important side benefit of the zero tolerance policy for teasing, taunting, ridicule and bullying is a climate that is conducive for building self-esteem and self-love. This will be especially true if the policy includes the school staff. Public ridicule from teachers both sets a bad example and destroys self-esteem.
Now is one of those windows of opportunities when school districts can really do something that will positively affect the quality of life on their school campuses. Immediately adopting my zero tolerance suggestion will so drastically change the campus atmosphere that the need for the picked-upons to engage in any form of retribution or "Pay-Back Time" will be virtually eliminated. Quick implementation of these suggestions will insure that no more lives are needlessly lost.
About the Author:
Jason Wittman, MPS is the Executive Director of Los Angeles Youth Supportive Services, Inc. ( <a href="http://www.la-youth.org/">http://www.la-youth.org </a> ) and has a private practice as a Life Coach specializing in working with parents of teenagers and young adults ( <a href="http://theparentscoach.com/">http://TheParentsCoach.com </a>) He can be reached at <a href="mailto:jason@theparentscoach.com">jason@theparentscoach.com </a> or 323-969-8726
--
Original Source: Progressive U
<a href="http://www.progressiveu.org/023939-a-common-sense-proposal-for-preventing-revenge-pay-back-time-school-shootings">http://www.progressiveu.org/023939-a-common-sense-proposal-for-preventing-revenge-pay-back-time-school-shootings</a>
This work is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic License</a>.
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic
Title
A name given to the resource
A Common Sense Proposal for Preventing
bullying
marginalized kids
pay-back
policies
recommendations
revenge
self-esteem
ttrb
-
Document
A resource containing textual data. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Brent Jesiek
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Jacob Lutz
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2007-09-25
Description
An account of the resource
By <a href="unirel@vt.edu">Jacob Lutz</a>
BLACKSBURG, Va., September 23, 2007 -- Following the release of the Report of the Virginia Tech Review Panel on August 30, 2007 and three separate internal review reports, Virginia Tech President Charles Steger and senior administrators have led an effort to examine the recommendations contained in these reports with the goal of meshing them and adopting best practices and procedures for all relevant areas on a forward-looking basis.
The Board believes that goal was accomplished in the development of the Virginia Tech Action Plan presented today at a special meeting of the Board of Visitors.
The Virginia Tech Action Plan sets forth the process of tracking all recommendations made from these reports and determining priorities, internal responsibility, procedures for evaluation, alternative solutions, action timelines, and financial analysis. The recommendations included in the Virginia Tech Action Plan are extensive and implementation will require substantial effort and expense.
Virginia Tech has already taken action on a number of items with an immediate priority, some of which were discussed at today's Board of Visitors meeting. Examples include: multiple redundant notification systems for students, faculty, and staff; additional security devices and measures; additional counseling resources; and many other steps to improve the safety, security, and well-being of the Virginia Tech community.
The Board of Visitors commends President Charles Steger in the adoption of the Virginia Tech Action Plan and for his leadership in these most difficult times. The Board of Visitors would also like to thank the students, staff, faculty and administrators of Virginia Tech for their outstanding service and commitment in responding to the events of April 16, 2007. Their leadership, devotion, and cooperative spirit have been instrumental in moving Virginia Tech forward.
The Board of Visitors also extends its wishes for ongoing recovery to the families of the deceased and the survivors, their families and all of those affected by the terrible events of April 16, 2007. The magnitude of losses and injuries suffered by these victims, their families, the Virginia Tech community, and our Commonwealth is immeasurable. By adopting the Virginia Tech Action Plan with the goal of implementing changes that will reduce the risks of future violence and promote the well-being of our students, faculty, and staff, we are honoring the lives and sacrifices of all who have suffered and advancing the notion of service that is fundamental to Virginia Tech's mission.
Contact Jacob Lutz at <a href="mailto:unirel@vt.edu">unirel@vt.edu</a> or 540-231-5396.
--
Original Source: Virginia Tech News
<a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear=2007&itemno=554">http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear=2007&itemno=554</a>
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Title
A name given to the resource
Statement by Virginia Tech Board of Visitors regarding the Virginia Tech Action Plan
action plan
board of visitors
bov
recommendations
reports
review panel
-
Document
A resource containing textual data. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Brent Jesiek
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Larry Hincker
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2007-09-25
Description
An account of the resource
By <a href="mailto:hincker@vt.edu">Larry Hincker</a>
BLACKSBURG, Va., September 25, 2007 -- The Virginia Tech Board of Visitors received a briefing at a special meeting September 23 on how the university plans to evaluate the hundreds of recommendations resulting from various reviews resulting from the Tragedy of April 16.
"Reviewing, understanding, analyzing, prioritizing, and tracking the many recommendations represent a major project management task. We have created a blueprint for the next steps," said President Charles W. Steger.
With 380 recommendations, large and small, ranging from whether to lock all academic and administrative buildings to whether to devote file servers to emergency activities, the recommendations are far reaching. "Some items are already implemented or underway. But others will require careful analysis, cost evaluation, and campus wide discussions," said Steger.
A matrix developed by the Office of the Senior Fellow for Resource Development under former Executive Vice President Minnis Ridenour, links the various recommendations from the Virginia Tech Review Panel (the governor's panel) and the three internal review committees on Security Infrastructure; Information and Communications Infrastructure; and the Interface between Counseling Services, Judicial Affairs, Academic Affairs, and Legal. It includes project management tools to appropriately task, evaluate, and act on the myriad recommendations.
Each recommendation will be under the purview of a vice president or vice provost. "Although many recommendations are already in the process of implementation, we expect that analysis, evaluation, and identification of funding sources likely will require most of the academic year. And of course, many recommendations such as changes to state or federal codes rest outside the university's purview but we will be tracking closely," said Steger.
In order to ensure campus input where needed, President Steger is appointing two advisory groups composed of faculty, staff and students. The Committee on Human Dimensions will be chaired by Vice President for Student Affairs Zenobia Hikes, and the Committee on Security and Infrastructure will be chaired by Dean of the Pamplin College of Business Richard Sorenson.
The Board also reviewed and approved an update to the six year plan as required under the Higher Education Restructuring Act. The law asks the university to develop six year plans to forecast enrollment, budget needs and tuition, and certain academic activities related to the Restructuring Act goals.
<a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear=2007&itemno=554">Read a statement</a> by Rector of the Board of Visitors, Jacob Lutz, regarding the Virginia Tech Action Plan.
Contact Larry Hincker at <a href="mailto:hincker@vt.edu">hincker@vt.edu</a> or (540) 231-5396.
--
Original Source: Virginia Tech News
<a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear=2007&itemno=553">http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear=2007&itemno=553</a>
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Title
A name given to the resource
Board of Visitors reviews blueprint for analyzing April 16 recommendations
board of visitors
bov
recommendations
reports
review committees
-
Document
A resource containing textual data. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Brent Jesiek
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Virginia Tech Review Panel
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2007-08-30
Description
An account of the resource
<p><b>Mass Shootings at Virginia Tech
April 16, 2007
Report of the Review Panel</b>
Presented to
Governor Kaine
Commonwealth of Virginia
August 2007
<a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/0 COVER_.pdf">Cover</a> (pdf, 224kb)
<a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/01 Inside cover.pdf">Inside Cover</a> (pdf, 39kb)
<a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/01 TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf">Table of Contents</a> (pdf, 52kb)
<a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/1 DEDICATION.pdf">Dedication</a> (pdf, 525kb)
<a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/2 FOREWORD.pdf">Foreward</a> (pdf, 62kb)
<a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS doc.pdf">Acknowledgements</a> (pdf, 51kb)
<a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/4 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS.pdf">Summary of Key Findings</a> (pdf, 72kb)
Chapters</p>
<p><ul id="obj" style="margin-left:1em;">
<li>I - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/5 CHAPTER I BACKGROUND AND SCOPE.pdf">Background and Scope</a> (pdf, 100kb)</li><li>II - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/6 CHAPTER II UNIVERSITY SETTING SECURITY.pdf">University Setting Security</a> (pdf, 647kb)</li><li>III - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/7 CHAPTER III TIMELINE OF EVENTS.pdf">Timeline of Events</a> (pdf, 103kb)</li><li>IV - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/8 CHAPTER IV LIFE AND MENTAL HEALTH HISTORY OF CHOpdf.pdf">Mental Health History of Seung Hui Cho</a> (pdf, 280kb)</li><li>V - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/9 CHAPTER V INFORMATION PRIVACY LAWS.pdf">Information Privacy Laws</a> (pdf, 156kb)</li><li>VI - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/10 CHAPTER VI GUN PURCHASE AND CAMPUS GUN POLICIES.pdf">Gun Purchase and Campus Policies</a> (pdf, 111kb)</li><li>VII - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/11 CHAPTER VII DOUBLE MURDER AT WAJ Hall .pdf">Double Murder at West Ambler Johnston</a> (pdf, 297kb)</li><li>VIII - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/12 CHAPTER VIII MASS MURDER AT NORRIS HALL.pdf">Mass Murder at Norris Hal</a>l (pdf, 399kb)</li><li>IX - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/13 CHAPTER IX EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES RESPONSE.pdf">Emergency Medical Services Response</a> (pdf, 855kb)</li><li>X - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/14 CHAPTER X OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ME.pdf">Office of the Chief Medical Examiner</a> (pdf, 175kb)</li><li>XI - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/15 CHAPTER XI AFTERMATH.pdf">Immediate Aftermath and the Long Road to Healing</a> (pdf, 177kb)</li></ul></p><p id="nq">Appendices</p><p id="nq"><ul id="obj" style="margin-left:1em;"><li>A - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/17 APPENDIX A - Executive Order 53 2007.pdf">Executive Order 53</a> (pdf, 932kb)</li><li>B - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/18 APPENDIX B - Individuals Interviewed by Research Panel.pdf">Individuals Interviewed by Research Panel</a> (pdf, 94kb)</li><li>C - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/19 APPENDIX C - Public Meeting Agenda.pdf">Public Meeting Agenda</a> (pdf, 155kb)</li><li>D - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/20 APPENDIX D - Recommendations on Methodology.pdf">Recommendations on Revised Methodology</a> (pdf, 79kb)</li><li>E - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/21 APPENDIX E - Guidelines for Choosing Messaging System.pdf">Virginia Tech Guidelines for Choosing Alerting System</a> (pdf, 54kb)</li><li>F - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/22 APPENDIX F - Excerpts from VTs ERP.pdf">Active Shooter Excerpt from University of Virginia Emergency Response Plan</a> (pdf, 65kb)</li><li>G - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/23 APPENDIX G - Letters from Dept of Education.pdf">Guidance Letters on Interpretation of FERPA and HIPAA Rules from U.S. Department Of Education</a> (pdf, 5.85MB)</li><li>H - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/24 APPENDIX H - Explanations of Firpa and Hipaa Laws.pdf">Summary of Information Privacy Laws and Guidance from U.S. Department of Education</a> (pdf, 87kb)</li><li>I - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/25 APPENDIX I - Potential Buyer Forms.pdf">Federal and Virginia Gun Purchaser Forms</a> (pdf, 2.87MB)</li><li>J - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/26 APPENDIX J - Notification of Adjudication.pdf">Notification of Adjudication of Involuntary Commitment or Incapacitation</a> (pdf, 512kb)</li><li>K - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/27 APPENDIX K - Article on Mixture of Guns and Alcohol on Ca.pdf">Articles on Mixture of Guns and Alcohol on Campus</a> (pdf, 790kb)</li><li>L - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/27 APPENDIX L - Fatal School Shooting in the US.pdf">Fatal School Shootings in the United States: 1966-2007</a> (pdf, 1.75MB)</li><li>M - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/28 APPENDIX M - RED FLAGS WARNING SIGNS AND INDICATORS.pdf">Red Flags, Warning Signs and Indicators</a> (pdf, 68kb)</li><li>N - <a href="/mirrors/techPanelReport-docs/29 APPENDIX N - CHO PROFILE.pdf">A Theoretical Profile of Seung Hui Cho</a> (pdf, 48kb)</li></ul></p>
<p>--
Original Sources:<br />
<a href="http://www.governor.virginia.gov/TempContent/techPanelReport.cfm">http://www.governor.virginia.gov/TempContent/techPanelReport.cfm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.vtreviewpanel.org/report/index.html">http://www.vtreviewpanel.org/report/index.html</a></p>
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Title
A name given to the resource
Report of the Virginia Tech Review Panel
findings
mass shootings at virginia tech
recommendations
report
review panel
virginia tech review panel
-
Document
A resource containing textual data. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre text.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Brent Jesiek
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Larry Hincker
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2007-08-26
Description
An account of the resource
<p>By <a href="mailto:hincker@vt.edu">Larry Hincker</a>
BLACKSBURG, Va., August 22, 2007 -- On May 9, 2007, Virginia Tech President Charles Steger directed three internal reviews in the wake of the April 16 tragedy on the Virginia Tech campus. He directed the chairs "to look at strengths and weaknesses of our existing systems/infrastructure and how they may be improved or augmented to address emergency situations that might arise in the future."
These reviews are internal in structure and focus and not intended to be forensic in nature. Says Steger, "I asked for the creation of two different, but concurrent review processes. The external review commissioned by Governor Kaine is essentially investigatory in nature, while ours is a forward looking review of university policy, resources, and infrastructure through the prism of April 16."
<b>The Security Infrastructure Group</b> was charged with examining the university's existing security systems and recommending changes that would enhance the university's ability to respond quickly and effectively in situations where the safety of the campus community is jeopardized. This group was also directed to identify strategies that might decrease the probability of such situations occurring, looking at both technological and behavioral aspects.
<b>The Information and Communications Infrastructure Group</b> analyzed and inventoried the communication infrastructure and information systems used during the crisis period, evaluated their performance, and identifies tactics and strategies for improvements.
<b>The Interface Group</b> evaluated the relationships between the university's student counseling services, academic affairs, judicial affairs, and the legal system. It was charged with examining the existing systems and the interface between them and determining what constraints, legal or otherwise, hamper effective interactions in order to respond to and support at-risk students.
<b>Security Infrastructure Group</b>
Among its findings the security infrastructure group found good cooperation and sound agreements between Virginia Tech and local police, fire, and EMS jurisdictions including ongoing training exercises; sound emergency communications; robust communications infrastructure; a sound emergency preparedness plan; engagement of the leadership in campus emergencies; and a nationally accredited campus police department.
The security group recommends enhancements in physical infrastructure, emergency communications, emergency preparedness, and selected protocols.
Infrastructure recommendations include modification of building door hardware, installation of locks on general assignment classrooms, evaluating the utility of centrally controlled electronic key card access to key academic and administrative facilities (such as the system currently in place on all residence halls), constructing a public safety building combining the university police and rescue squad, and evaluating installation of centrally monitored video surveillance cameras.
Communications recommendations include mass notification techniques within classrooms and other locations, message board in key or high profile public areas and along major vehicular thoroughfares, a people locator system, and further articulation of the recently adopted VT Alerts notification system.
Emergency preparedness recommendations include updating the emergency preparedness plan, more frequent emergency exercises or drills, creation of building coordinators for emergencies, and identification of backups for the policy committee (university leadership with oversight of an emergency).
Protocols include increased education of the university community about appropriate emergency response actions and creation of a comprehensive security master plan and campus security committee.
<a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/documents/2007-08-22_security_infrastructure.pdf">Read the full Security Infrastructure Group report</a> (PDF) ››
<b>Information and Communications Infrastructure Group</b>
Broadly defined, telecommunications comprises the university's data network, telephone systems (university and/or vendor owned), cable TV, educational systems, and centralized information services. They were dramatically stressed but performed adequately during the crisis. The university on-campus phone system was not degraded but was affected by external problems. External cellular telephone systems and the Public Switched Telephone Network (hardwire telephone systems off campus) experienced huge demand increases and experienced some blocking of calls during the initial periods of the crisis on April 16.
Other university systems experienced some loading, which were quickly identified and rectified, and performed well with no significant problems. For example, the university website www.vt.edu saw a 3,000 percent increase in traffic on April 16, Virginia Tech Police dispatch experienced 450 percent increase, and the university switchboard experienced a 300 percent increase in calls.
Emergency Responder Radio Communication continues to suffer nationally and locally from "interoperability" issues because they use a variety of radio systems and frequencies. Radio systems typically do not support mobile data, encryption, GIS, or other advanced capabilities. Indicative of relatively common signal penetration problems in large buildings, emergency responders reported that radios did not work in some areas of Norris Hall.
This group provides a series of strategic and tactical recommendations. The full report details more than 120 tactical recommendations. Two major strategies emerge:
1) <i>Installation of a new fully integrated digital campus architecture for all telecommunications functions based on Internet Protocol (IP).</i> The new system, based on a diverse optical core and including wireless and wired access, would fully integrate all telecommunications functions including voice, video, data, entertainment, and educational systems. This system could remediate every problem and enable every innovation identified by the study committee.
2) <i>Make selected research and administrative IT capabilities available to local first responders to improve radio communications capabilities.</i> In addition to improving interoperability problems, the new systems would be integrated with IP based information architecture allowing new applications such as GIS, identity management, sensor networks, location awareness, high-speed links to criminal information databases.
<a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/documents/2007-08-22_communications_infrastructure.pdf">Read the full Information and Communications Infrastructure Group report</a> (PDF) ››
<b>Interface Group</b>
The Interface Group looked at policies, procedures, capabilities and interdepartmental relationships and communications for the selected areas related to identifying and supporting at-risk students. By its nature the system was found to be logically connected and responsive. The Division of Student Affairs is at the core and supported by and interacting with law enforcement, the academic enterprise, and other university resources offices.
Consistent with the national findings of the federal report commissioned by President Bush, the Interface Group found some confusion about applicability and interpretation of privacy laws among some offices or faculty. To some extent, this created internal silos and feedback problems preventing some offices from having salient information on students at risk. The "system may not be robust enough to provide the kind of analysis that is warranted by more complex, high risk cases... with need for significant mental health services."
The committee makes a series of recommendations under three broad themes:
<b>1. Expanding Capacity in the System</b></p>
<p><ul><li>Refining and expanding the Care Team, a key SA group that identifies and responds to students at risk (among other responsibilities), including addition of VTPD to standing membership and connecting academic personnel to deliberations where appropriate.</li>
<li>Creating a Threat Assessment Team charged with examining the most complex cases of distressed students and empowering it to act quickly, when necessary.</li>
<li>Expanding Case Management Capacity by adding case managers to the Dean of Students office and Cook Counseling Center to improve follow-up with students and to improve information flow through appropriate units about students at risk.</li></ul></p><p><b>2. Improving Communications in the System</b></p>
<p><ul><li>Improve Communications in the Systems with particular emphasis on privacy law education throughout the university, clarifying policies for communications with external agencies, establishing a central university contact with a clear picture of distressed students.</li></ul></p><p id ="nq"><b>3. Connecting Strategies for Identifying and Supporting at Risk Students to the Broader University Plan for Campus Safety</b></p>
<p><ul><li>Expanding Training of Administrators, Faculty, and Staff in Violence Prevention recognizing the campus safety is the province of all university employees to some extent.</li>
<li>Extending the University-wide Violence Prevention Policy to integrate the numerous university-wide efforts to enhance campus safety.</li>
<li>Building Community to Promote Individual and Community Well Being Virginia Tech has a strong, supportive, and vibrant community which is essential in creating a safe campus environment with very good policies and support systems. However, it is recommended that a more systematic approach be instituted with campus well-being as a goal.</li></ul></p><p><a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/documents/2007-08-22_internal_communications.pdf">Read the full Interface Group report</a> (PDF) ››</p>
<p><hr size="1" width="50%" align="left" /></p>
<p><b>Read and/or listen to formal statements regarding the reports:</b></p><p><ul><li><a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/documents/2007-08-22_steger.doc" target="new">Charles W. Steger, president</a> (MS Word) | <em><a href="http://www.podcasts.vt.edu/internal-steger.mp3">Listen</a></em></li><li><a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/documents/2007-08-22_hyatt.doc" target="new">James A. Hyatt, executive vice president and chief operating officer</a> (MS Word) | <em><a href="http://www.podcasts.vt.edu/internal-hyatt.mp3">Listen</a></em></li><li><a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/documents/2007-08-22_blythe.doc" target="new">Earving L. Blythe, vice president for information technology</a> (MS Word) | <em><a href="http://www.podcasts.vt.edu/internal-blythe.mp3">Listen</a></em></li><li><a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/documents/2007-08-22_niles.doc" target="new">Jerry Niles, retired dean, College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences</a> (MS Word) | <em><a href="http://www.podcasts.vt.edu/internal-niles.mp3">Listen</a></em></li></ul></p><p>Contact Larry Hincker at <a href="mailto:hincker@vt.edu">hincker@vt.edu</a> or (540) 231-5396.
##07433##
--
Original Source: Virginia Tech News<br />
<a href="http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear=2007&itemno=459">http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear=2007&itemno=459</a></p>
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Title
A name given to the resource
Overview of the findings and recommendations of the April 16 tragedy internal review committees
findings
information and communications infrastructure
internal review committees
recommendations
reports
security intrastructure
statements